data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/316f5/316f55be31225337d3cb366ca47a05aa0d8b1ea7" alt="Razer deathadder 2013 vs chroma"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb4d0/fb4d08df2d02684010cd948937e191bc0f6a6c9d" alt="razer deathadder 2013 vs chroma razer deathadder 2013 vs chroma"
As for the resolution accuracy, it would have been nice if they provided some examples of how they measured it.Īside from Razers over the top advertising, you can be sure the PMW3389 is a top optic and you won’t find any noticeable difference between it and any Zowie mouse (Avago 3310 / PMW 3366) or Logitech mouse (PMW3366).Īs for the DeathAdder Chroma, it has the 3989 which is a little older than the PMW3389 used by the Elite. You can be sure you can get the DPI you want whether it is 400/800/1600. I wouldn’t bother listening to these numbers as nobody uses a mouse at 16,000 DPI. The PMW3389 is a top optic and as advertised by Razer allows for up to 16,000 DPI and has a resolution accuracy of 99.4%. However by taking the Elite apart to see the sensor most agree that it is likely a PMW3389. This is something that has annoyed mouse enthusiasts for a long time. Razer is very hush hush about the sensors their mice use.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/316f5/316f55be31225337d3cb366ca47a05aa0d8b1ea7" alt="Razer deathadder 2013 vs chroma"